1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18792 of 2025 Decided on: 12.12.2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tek Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith and Ms. Saroj, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Sikander Bhushan and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocates General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 and Pushap Kumar & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others.3 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2CWP No.1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 3CWP No.8839 of 2023, decided on 07.11.2024 2 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 12, 2025 Judge yogesh