Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3651 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/600/2023 · 2025-03-18

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 600 of 2023 Applicant :- Om Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Singh,Ganesh Shanker Srivastava,Manjit Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ajay Kumar Shukla,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present. Sri Ajay Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. 2. The records show that even previously on 12.4.2024, there was no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application and a coordinate Bench of this Court directed the matter to be listed peremptorily. Today again, despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application. 3. Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad