THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, v. RAJKUMAR KURRE
MCC/931/2025 · 2025-09-10
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36504 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36504 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:46648
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 931 of 2025 1 - The New India Insurance Company Limited, Through The Divisional Manager, The New India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Sada Complex, Taxi Stand, T.P. Nagar, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. (Insurance Company)
... Applicant Versus 1 - Rajkumar Kurre S/o Late Raghuvar Kurre Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Charpara, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Budhwari Bazar, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Kekti Bai W/o Rajkumar Kurre Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Charpara, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Budhwari Bazar, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Santosh Chandra S/o Jageshwar Chandra Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Sarasdola, P.S. Malkharoda, Distt. Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, At Present Sector- 5, Balco Nagar, Tahsil And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Leela Devi Agrawal W/o Subhash Chandra Agrawal R/o Anand Bhawan, Apartment Sumangal Apartment, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Hemant Kumar Chandra S/o Subilal R/o Ganesh Nagar, Chuichuiha Para, Bilaspur, Tahsil And Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-Applicants For Applicant : Ms. Gunja Taram, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate For Non-Applicants No. 1 to 4 : Ms. S. Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Aditya Khare, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order On Board SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY
2 11/09/2025
1. This MCC is filed by the applicants seeking correction of the typographical error in the impugned order dated 18.06.2025 passed in MAC No. 852/2019 pointing out that in the impugned order, the registration number of offending vehicle i.e. Innova Car is wrongly mentioned as CG 10 AF 5835 instead of CG 10 F 5835.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to typographical error, the number of Innova Car involved in the accident is erroneously mentioned as CG 10 AF 5835 in paras 2 and 6 of the impugned award, whereas, the correct number is CG 10 F 5835.
3. Submission of counsel for applicant is not opposed by the counsel for the Non-applicants No. 1 to 4.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned
order.
5. On due consideration of the submissions made by the counsel for the respective parties, this MCC is allowed and it is directed that the Innova Car No. CG 10 AF 5835 as mentioned in para 2 and 6 of the impugned order dated 18.06.2025 be read as CG 10 F 5835.
6. Registry is directed to make this order as part of record of MAC No. 1087/2019. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/--/-/--------/--/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey