Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36502 (RAJ)

PARMESHWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14704/2024 · 2025-01-13

Yogendra Kumar Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JD:2037] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14412/2024 Datar Singh S/o Surjhan Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jhagdwas, P.s Degana , Dist Nagaur. (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Chittorgarh ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14704/2024 Parmeshwar S/o Kaluram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 24 R.p.s. Colony, Rawtbhata, P.s. Rawatbhata, Dist Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Begu Dist Chittorgarh) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shakti Singh Mr. Sikander Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati,PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 13/01/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed by the applicants Datar Singh S/o Surjhan Singh and Parmeshwar S/o Kaluram under Section 439 Cr.P.C. against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.113/2023 registered at Police Station Rawatbhata District Chittorgarh for the offence(s) under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC. [2025:RJ-JD:2037] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14412/2024] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that challan has been filed. He further submits that applicants are behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, they deserve to be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications. 4. Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the applicants on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicants shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 64-65- Arti/-