Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36492 (KAR)

K V RAGHAVENDRA v. GENERAL MANAGER OF

WP/33831/2024 · 2025-01-31

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4543 WP No. 33831 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.33831 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K V RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS DIVISIONAL SECRETARY SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS MAZDOOR UNION, SWRMU UNION OFFICE BEHIND DRM OFFICE BENGALURU-560023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.K. DIWAKARA., SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. HITESH GOWDA B.J., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ADITYA D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GENERAL MANAGER OF SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS OFFICE AT GADAG ROAD HUBBALLI RETURNING OFFICER & PRINCIPAL CHIEF PERSONAL OFFICER GADAG ROAD HUBALI-580020 2. PRESIDING OFFICER FOR UNION ELECTION AND ADDL. DIVISION RAILWAY MANGER Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4543 WP No. 33831 of 2024 SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY BANGALORE-560023. 3. ASST. PRESIDING OFFICER FOR UNION ELECTION AND SENIOR DIVISIONLA PERSONAL OFFICER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY BANGALORE-560023. 4. A M D CRUZ AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS GENEARL SECRERTARY SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MAZDOOR UNION MAZDOOR SOUDHA BEHIND DRM’S OFFICE SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS BENGALRU-560023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA SINGH., CGC FOR R1 TO R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 TO 3 ISSUE THE CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO PETITIONER AS R-4 MEMBERSHIP WAS NOT CONTINUED AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO CONSIDER THE ANNUAL GENERAL BODY RESOLUTION HELD ON 08.12.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4543 WP No. 33831 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and approach the competent authority in the Labour department to redress his grievances. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL