Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:2497
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 122 of 2025 03 April, 2025
Mehboob
--Revisionist Versus
M/s Puspak Financers & Ors.
--Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that this revision is filed against the impugned order dated 06.02.2025 passed by 3rd Judicial Magistrate, District Haridwar in Complaint Case No.913 of 2022, whereby the application filed by the revisionist/accused u/s 340 of Cr.P.C., has been dismissed.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 would vehemently oppose this revision and would submit that the revisionist/accused has straightaway come before this Court invoking the revisional jurisdiction without exhausting the equally efficacious remedy available to him to file revision before the Sessions Court.
3.
At this stage,
learned counsel for the revisionist/accused seeks permission of the Court to 1
2025:UHC:2497 withdraw the revision with liberty to file the same before the concerned Sessions Court.
4.
Permission is granted.
5.
Present criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as above.
(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 03.04.2025 Rajni
2 RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48 448ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f 17d01342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B 4DF4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F5306 16A158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.04.04 16:54:18 +05'30'