Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36479 (HP)

CHANCHALO DEVI v. M. SUDHA DEVI AND OTHERS

COPC/885/2025 · 2025-12-12

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.885 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Chanchalo Devi …….Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Pooja Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Singh Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 11.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Under Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, fairly states that Government has conveyed its approval for offering appointment to the petitioner i.e. Smt. Chanchalo Devi, against the post of TGT(Hindi) as Job Trainee as per the scheme issued by the Government, Department of Personnel vide notification dated 19th July, 2025, on fixed remuneration i.e. Rs. 21,500/- per month on compassionate grounds by granting one time relaxation in the guidelines issued by the Government vide letter dated 4th July 2018, subject to the condition that all codal formalities may be completed in that regard. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of with a direction to the Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh to offer appointment to the petitioner against the post of TGT(Hindi) as Job Trainee in terms of communication dated 11.12.2025 expeditiously preferably within a period of two weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken against the erring officials. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12, 2025 (shankar)s