Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36474 (MAD)

V.SARAVANAN v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

WP/9108/2025 · 2025-03-19

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/5 WP No. 9108 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 9108 of 2025 1. V.Saravanan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration No. 100 Santhome High Road, Chennai 28 2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Namakkal District 3.The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, No. 91/25 Thepakulam Street, Near Anna Salai, Tiruchengode 637 211. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund the stamp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 WP No. 9108 of 2025 duty of Rs.16,81,100/- (Rupees sixteen lakhs eighty two thousand and one hundred only) and excess registration fee of Rs.2,40,300/- (Rupees two lakhs forty thousand and three hundred only) totally summing Rs. 19,22,400/- (Rupees nineteen lakhs twenty two thousand and four hundred only) which has been collected by the 3rd respondent in respect of the sale certificate, issued by the Asset Reconstruction company (India) Limited, under SARFAESI Act 2002, registered as Document No.8252/2024 within a time limit stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Ms.V.Gopika For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Vijay Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 11.02.2025, wherein, the petitioner is seeking for the refund of the stamp duty paid to the 3 rd respondent while the Sale Certificate was presented before the 3 rd respondent and which was registered without following the procedure under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 WP No. 9108 of 2025 2.Heard Ms.V.Gopika, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.B.Vijay, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. 3.Taking into consideration the stand that has been taken by the petitioner and without going into the merits of the case, there shall be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 11.02.2025, on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No Costs. 19-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 WP No. 9108 of 2025 To 1. The Inspector General Of Registration No. 100 Santhome High Road, Chennai 28 2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Namakkal District 3.The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, No. 91/25 Thepakulam Street, Near Anna Salai, Tiruchengode 637 211. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5 WP No. 9108 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr WP No. 9108 of 2025 19-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis