APHC010596342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4852/2024 Between: 1. A SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O A REDDEPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/O D NO 3 MARRIMAKULAPALLE POST, PUNGANUR REVENUE MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. A.P 1. NIMANAPALLI MANOJ REDDY, S/O NOT KNOW PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAMANER SUB DIVISION, NOW WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KADAPA PIN CODE. 516001. (EARST WHILE SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI CHITTOR DISTRICT. AT PRESENT REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER SUB 2. P BHAVANI, W/O NOT KNOW. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER, CHITTOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 517408 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for the willful disobedience in not complying this Hon'ble Court orders passed in W.P.No.735 of 2024 dated 24 pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4852/2024 A SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O A REDDEPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/O D NO 3-20 NALLAGUTLAPALLI VILLAGE , MARRIMAKULAPALLE POST, PUNGANUR REVENUE MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. A.P ...PETITIONER AND NIMANAPALLI MANOJ REDDY, S/O NOT KNOW PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAMANER SUB DIVISION, NOW WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KADAPA PIN CODE. 516001. (EARST WHILE SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI CHITTOR DISTRICT. AT PRESENT REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER SUB- DIVISION.) P BHAVANI, W/O NOT KNOW. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER, CHITTOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 517408 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for the willful disobedience in not complying this Hon'ble Court orders passed in W.P.No.735 of 2024 dated 24-01 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI A SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O A REDDEPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 20 NALLAGUTLAPALLI VILLAGE , MARRIMAKULAPALLE POST, PUNGANUR REVENUE MANDAL ...PETITIONER NIMANAPALLI MANOJ REDDY, S/O NOT KNOW PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAMANER SUB DIVISION, NOW WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KADAPA PIN CODE. 516001. (EARST WHILE SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI CHITTOR DISTRICT. AT PRESENT REVENUE P BHAVANI, W/O NOT KNOW. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAMANER, CHITTOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 517408 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, for the willful disobedience in not complying this 01-2024 and 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHA SHAIK Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 24.01.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.735 of 2024. Sri Basha Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that pursuant to filing of this Contempt Case, the respondent authorities have disposed of the ROR Appeal filed by the petitioner. On the other hand, Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, while reiterating the contents of the counter affidavits of respondent Nos.2 and 3, admits that there is some delay in disposing of the appeal filed by the petitioner. They submit that the sole appellant has died and the legal representatives of the deceased appellant could not be brought on record in time, as such, the said delay was occurred, however same was neither wanton nor due to willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. Hence, prayed to close the Contempt Case. In view of the above, since the respondents have complied the orders of this Court and have also explained the delay satisfactorily, this Court is inclined to close the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11.07.2025 MP 4 198 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:4852 of 2024 Date: 11.07.2025 MP