Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36469 (HP)

SUNEEL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/9601/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9601 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Suneel Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Petitioner herein, who at present is working as Lecturer (School New) Physics in GSSS Gahllian, District Bilaspur, H.P., is aggrieved of order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-1), whereby he has been transferred from afore station to GSSS Mangal, District Solan. 2. Since petitioner has already completed normal tenure of posting at present place of posting, this Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned transfer order, however, having taken note of ground of couple case raised by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file representation within a period of one week to the competent authority, praying therein for his transfer/adjustment at a convenient station, which in- 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 turn shall be decided by the afore authority expeditiously, preferably, within a period of ten days, in terms of Transfer Policy, formulated by the Government of Himachal Pradesh. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereupon taking note of the fact that wife of the petitioner is also a Government employee and at present, she is teaching at GSSS Salwad, District Bilaspur. Till the time, representation, if filed within the time stipulated by this Court, is not decided by the competent authority, interim order passed by this Court shall remain in force. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 11, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)