14.WP-3123-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3123 OF 2025 Manisha Bapusaheb Godse and Anr. ….Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar a/w. Mr. Vinayak R. Kumbhar, Mr. Rajendra B. Khaire and Mr. Aniket S. Phapale i/b. Mrs. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioners. Mrs. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the State. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 11th JUNE, 2025 P.C. :- 1. We find that the impugned order dated 02.12.2024, is not an order of rejection, but a communication of the deficiencies/queries raised by the Deputy Director, Education, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur. The said Officer has entered his affidavit in reply dated 11.03.2025, in which he has stated that deficiency No.4 has already been cured by the Management. 2. Let the Management tender its revised proposal in the light of the said queries, within 45 days from today. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 Authority shall deal with the said proposal by following the due procedure laid down in law, within a period of 45 days and pass a reasoned order. Gauri Gaekwad 1 of 2 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2025.06.13 20:45:22 +0530 14.WP-3123-2025.odt 3. In the event, an adverse order is passed, the Petitioners would be at liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law. If the approval is granted, further steps for grant of Shalarth ID shall be initiated by the respective parties, expeditiously. 4. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Gauri Gaekwad 2 of 2