Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36463 (CHH)

UDAY MAAN RAM v. DR. KAMALPREET SINGH

CONT/1069/2024 · 2025-05-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20142 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1069 of 2024 1 Uday Maan Ram S/o. Shri Sampat Ram Aged About 59 Years Presently Working As Caretaker (Daily Wager), Department Of Public Works, At Govt. Rest House - Balrampur, Office Of Executive Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Ramanujganj Division, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 Gabriyal Ram Lakda S/o. Nirmal Ram Aged About 54 Years Presently Working As Chowkidar (Daily Wager), At Pwd Circuit House, Gamhariya, Jashpur Nagar, Office Of Executive Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Jashpur Division, District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Dr. Kamalpreet Singh Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 K.K. Pipri Engineer-In-Chief, Department Of Public Works, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 N.K. Jayant Chief Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Ambikapur, JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.05.03 12:43:46 +0530 2 District - Surguja (C.G.) 4 K.P. Sant Superintendent Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Pwd Circle, Ambikapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) 5 Santosh Kumar Gupta Executive Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Ramanujganj Division, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 Virendra Choudhary Executive Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Jashpur Division, District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Abhishek Chandra Gupta, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 02/05/2025 Heard. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this court dated 01.04.2024 passed in WPS No. 6626 of 2017 has been complied with. 2. In view of the submission made, the contempt petition is disposed off with liberty that if the petitioner is aggrieved by any act of respondent he may approach the appropriate forum. 3. Rule is discharged. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti