Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36455 (PNJ)

RAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/15448/2025 · 2025-07-09

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-15448-2025 -1- 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15448-2025 Date of Decision:09.07.2025 Ravinder Singh …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 with a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.23 dated 27.02.2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 324(4), 351(2) of BNSS, 2023 registered at Police Station Nakodar Sadar, District Jalandhar. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 20.03.2025, this Court had noticed the following contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner:- “The counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is the nephew of complainant Joginder Singh while main accused Jaswant Singh is son of the complainant. Actually, there is a property dispute between the complainant and his son, both of whom are residing in Canada. It is further submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with the incident, which is recorded in the FIR. It is further submitted that the petitioner, who is having no criminal history, is ready and willing to join investigation with the police.” HEMLATA 2025.07.09 22:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-15448-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 20.03.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 6. Pending application(s) stand(s) also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 09.07.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.07.09 22:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document