APHC010597252024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 31170/2024 Between: 1. T. PREMA KUMARI,, D/O , K.Y. PRABHAKAR, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DISTRICT SCHEDULE CASTES SERVICE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. ANDHRA PRADESH SCHEDULES CASTES CO OPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD, REPRESENTED BY VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TADEPALLI, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT SCHEDULES CASTES SERVICE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of 2nd Respondent in not disposing the Appeal presented by the petitioner on 21.12.2024 as per direction of this honorable court in WP No 25661 of 2024 dated 19.12.2024 and the same is pending on the file of 2 nd Respondent, even then the 3 rd Respondent is insisting to Relive the petitioner to retire from service on attaining the age of 60 years by 31.12.2024 instead of attains the age of superannuation of (62) sixty two years as per GO Ms No 15 dated 31.01.2022 issued by the 1 st respondent is illegal, arbitrary violation of Fundamental Rule 56, which is Replaced with A.P. Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act 23 of 1984 and the same was amended by act 4 of 2014 and was further amended with G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 31.01.2022 read with clause 19 and 24 of Approved service Rules of 3 rd Respondent Corporation besides Articles 14,19, 21 and 309 of Constitutional Law of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to retain/continue in to service in so far as petitioner is concerned by suspending the operation of Lr.No.A1/3030/APSC/2024 dated 02.04.2024 issued by the 3 rd Respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to retain/continue in to service in so far as the petitioner is concerned by suspend the operation of Lr.No.A1/3030/APSC/2024 dated 02.04.2024 issued by the 3 rd Respondent Pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 ::ORDER:: Sri Tata Singaiah Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 02.01.2025 SNI 4 199 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.31170 OF 2024 Dated: 02.01.2025 SNI