Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:54287 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11143 of 2025 Applicant :- Jahid Husain And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav,Radhey Shyam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Abhishek Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 542 of 2024 (State Vs. Jahid Husain and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 23 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 452, 427 and 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Utraon, District- Prayagraj as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 27.02.2024, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-8, Allahabad. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 MAA/- Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad