Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3645 (RAJ)

IRSHAD KHAN @ IRFAN S/O FAJRU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/757/2025 · 2025-01-17

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2523] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 681/2025 Naushad Khan S/o Subedeen Khan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Nangaliyan Ka Bas, Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 757/2025 1. Irshad Khan @ Irfan S/o Fajru Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Samaysingh Ka Bas, Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar). 2. Anni Khan S/o Asru Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Samaysingh Ka Bas, Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan, Ms. Swati Sharma, Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- [2025:RJ-JP:2523] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-681/2025] petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.415/2024 registered at Police Station Govindgarh (Alwar), District Alwar for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Naushad Khan S/o Subedeen Khan, 2. Irshad Khan @ Irfan S/o Fajru Khan and 3. Anni Khan S/o Asru Khan in connection with FIR No.415/2024 registered at Police Station Govindgarh (Alwar), District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before [2025:RJ-JP:2523] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-681/2025] the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/59-60