- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13665 OF 2024 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI G. K. KUMAR S/O. SRI KENCHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, FORMER MEMBER OF COMMITTEE, FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION (BAGAR HUKUM SAGUAVALI SAMITHI) R/AT BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 115. 2. SMT. CHETHANA M. R. WIFE OF SHRI G K KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, FORMER MEMBER OF COMMITTEE, FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION (BAGAR HUKUM SAGUAVALI SAMITHI) R/AT BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573115 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI AMAN NALINA LINGESH, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY BELUR POLICE STATION, BELUR TALUK HASSAN, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP FOR RESPODNENT, STATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SAMHITA, 2023, PRAYING TO, GRANT THE RELIEF OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS AND ISSUE A DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT STATE THAT IN THE EVENT OF ARREST OF THE PETITIONERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIR IN CR.NO.0098/2023 REGISTERED BY BELUR POLICE STATION FOR THE ALLEGED COMMISSION OF OFFENCES U/S 468, 464, 465, 471, 409, 420 AND 120B OF IPC AND PENDING CONSIDERATION ON THE FILE OF LXXXI Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGLAURU CITY (CCH-82) THE PETITIONERS SHALL BE RELEASED ON BAIL ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY THINK FIT TO IMPOSE AND ETC., THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Aman Nalina Lingesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent - State. 2. The petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail, for it having been turned down by the concerned Court in Crl.Misc.Nos.8899/2024. This Court qua other accused in Crl.P.No.11870/2024 disposed on 28.11.2024 has granted anticipatory bail to a co-accused by rendering the following reasons: “3. This Court has while directing investigation to be conducted into the alleged bartering away of the government land has observed as follows: - - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 “The petitioners at the relevant point in time i.e., between 2016 and 2023 were in the Council, all of them being political entities appointed as Chairman and Members of a particular Committee; the Committee known as Bagair Hukum Saguvali Samithi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Samithi’ for short). Accused No.1 / 1st petitioner was at the relevant point in time a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Belur constituency. He was the Chairman of the Samithi. Accused Nos.2 to 4 were its members and accused Nos.5 to 10 were the erstwhile members. Accused Nos.11 to 14 are the Tahsildars who were functioning at the relevant point in time at the said place and were Secretaries of the Samithi. The allegation revolves around the functioning of the said Samithi. It is alleged that the Samithi has created records and bartered away Government lands to an extent of 2750 acres to 1430 bogus beneficiaries, which are valued at more than Rs.750/- crores in the constituency of accused No.1, who was the Chairman of the Samithi. Based upon this allegation, the 2nd respondent/complainant seeks to knock at the doors of the jurisdictional Police to register the complaint. No action was taken. He knocks at the doors of the learned Magistrate invoking Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. seeking a reference for conduct of investigation into the allegations so made. The complaint is referred for - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 investigation to the jurisdictional Police under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C., after which a crime comes to be registered in Crime No.98 of 2023 for the afore- quoted offences. This Court by its order dated 16.06.2023 directed that no precipitate action be taken against the petitioners and the same is subsisting even as on date. 3. Heard Sri Ashok Haranahalli, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri S. Umapathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 4. The learned senior counsel would seek to contend that the complaint is bald and vague. What are the lands that are granted or what are the documents that are fabricated to grant the lands in favour of fictitious persons is not forthcoming from the complaint. If the complaint is so bald, the learned senior counsel would submit that what investigation the police would do, is un- understandable. He would submit that all the allegations are untrue and some of the accused being Government servants, no sanction is accorded under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C. The learned senior counsel would submit that the present complaint is an abuse - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 of the process of law and the members of the Samithi have acted strictly in consonance with law. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel for the complainant would take this Court through the statement of objections so filed by him and reports of Government servants filed by themselves when enquiry was directed to be held by the Assistant Commissioner into the illegalities. The Assistant Commissioner clearly holds that all the lands granted were bogus based upon fake genealogical tree certificates and granted to fake beneficiaries. The Government land in this manner is illegally donated for personal gains of the members of the Chairman, members of the Samithi and officers. He would contend that the question of sanction would arise only after investigation. The matter should be permitted to be investigated.” Xxxxxx In view of the preceding analysis, I hold that Bagair Hukum Committee has acted Bagair Kanoon, albeit, prima facie. 12. Finding no merit in the petition, the petition stands rejected. It is made clear that the observations made in the course of the order are only for the purpose of consideration of the case of petitioners under Section - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 482 of Cr.P.C. and the same shall not bind or influence the proceedings pending against them.” Pursuant to the dismissal of the aforesaid petition, in which the present petitioner is the 8th petitioner, files Crl.Misc.No.8899/2024 seeking grant of anticipatory bail in the light of the investigation permitted by this Court. This is turned down on the score that this Court has directed investigation as the role of this petitioner is also found. A perusal at the complaint or the finding rendered by this Court while dismissing the aforesaid Crl.P.No.5030/2023 nothing in particular against this petitioner who was a member of the Committee and an advocate of the area is found, prima facie, while several allegations are found against others.” 4. In the light of the petitioners being members of the Committee and the offences not heinous or punishable beyond seven years of imprisonment, I deem it appropriate to grant the petitioners anticipatory bail.” 3. In the light of anticipatory bail being granted to the co-accused, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 4. For the aforesaid reasons, the following: ORDER a. The criminal petition filed by the petitioners under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. b. The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.98/2023 of Belur Police Station, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall furnish a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with one solvent surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court; (ii) The petitioners shall be regular in appearing before the Court on every date of hearing as also when called upon to do so by the Trial Court; (iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or cause any threat to any of the prosecution witness/s in any manner. (iv) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called and submit all documents and details as may be called upon by the Investigating Officer. - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC:879 CRL.P No. 13665 of 2024 (v) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction of this Court without prior permission. (vi) In the event of violation of any of the above terms, the above bail shall stand automatically cancelled. The observations made above are only for the purpose of consideration of the application for anticipatory bail and the same shall not in any manner influence the trial. The Trial Court shall consider the case on its merits and without being influenced by this order. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NAA/CT-ASC List No.: 19 Sl No.: 7