Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36447 (AP)

SHAIK ABDUL SALEEM v. THE STATE OF A.P. & 2 OTHERS

CRLRC/2015/2011 · 2025-04-07

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010596972011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2015/2011 Between: Shaik Abdul Saleem ...PETITIONER AND The State of A.P and 2 others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: MD.Saleem Counsel for the Respondent(S): Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. No representation for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. 3. The revision case was filed challenging the order dated 15.06.2011 in M.P.No.61 of 2010 in O.P.No.117 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam granting Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) per month to the 2nd respondent and 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) to the 3rd respondent towards interim maintenance. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.2015 of 2011 Dated 07.04.2025 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that F.C.O.P.No.117 of 2010 itself was disposed of on 31.01.2013 by the learned Judge Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam pursuant to a joint memo filed by the parties thereof and the matter was compromised and not pressed the O.P. 5. I have perused the order in F.C.O.P.No.117 of 2010 dated 31.01.2013. In view of the dismissal of the F.C.O.P.No.117 of 2010, as not pressed, by the learned Trial Court nothing remains in this criminal revision case for any adjudication further. Therefore, this matter may be disposed of as compromised in between the parties. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.04.2025 KMS 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.2015 of 2011 Dated 07.04.2025 114 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2015/2011 07.04.2025 W KMS