JAY PRAKASH @ JAY PRAKASH NARAYAN v. RAM BARAN AND 38 OTHERS
A227/3378/2025 · 2025-04-08
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36445 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36445 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51652 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3378 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jay Prakash @ Jay Prakash Narayan Respondent :- Ram Baran And 38 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Milan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Indra Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. This is a petition on behalf of judgment debtor-defendant. The suit instituted by the plaintiff was decreed, against which, an appeal was preferred by the defendant-judgment debtor which was dismissed. In the execution proceedings, objections under Section 47 CPC were filed by the petitioner which was dismissed, against which, a revision was filed which is pending consideration.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only the notices have been issued and the revision has been admitted, but the stay has not been granted. Sri Indra Prakash Tiwari, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.6. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the other respondents, at this stage, the matter is being disposed of with a request to District Judge, Jaunpur to proceed with the Civil Revision No.31 of 2025 and decide the same, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations, present writ petition stands
disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit.
Order Date :- 9.4.2025 SK Goswami Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad