1 2025:CGHC:8352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1705 of 2022 1 - Garima Sharma W/o Swapnil Mittal Aged About 36 Years Partner Of M/s S M Shop R/o D 6 Sector-2, Agroha Society Behind Rewa Showroom, Raipura, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Suresh Mittal S/o Prahalad Mittal Aged About 64 Years Partner Of M/s S M Shop R/o D 6 Sector-2, Agroha Society Behind Rewa Showroom, Raipura, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Azad Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Amar Steel Through Its Director Mr. Shreyansh Kumar Jain, R/o Harsit Tower, Tatibandh Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akhand Pratap, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. along with Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.02.19 10:37:39 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akhand Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate along with Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “A. Allow the present Petition and quash the impugned FIR No. 168/2022 dt. 09.06.2022 [P.S. Azad Chowk Raipur] registered under Sections 120B & 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as all consequential proceedings arising out of or emanating therefrom; and B. Any other order(s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition stating that in the present matter, charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 3 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet