Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36429 (BOM)

AKASH PRALHAD LONDHE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRTARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND ANR

WP/3344/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe, Shri Ravindra V Ghuge

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.WP3344.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3344 OF 2025 Shri Akash Pralhad Londhe & Anr. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents. **** Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Vinayak R. Kumbhar, Mr. Rajendra B. Khaire, Mr. Aniket S. Phapale i/b. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.P. Kamble, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2/State. **** CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2025 P.C. : 1. We find that the impugned order dated 21st October, 2024 is not an order of rejection, but a communication of the deficiencies/queries raised by the Deputy Director, Education, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur. 2. Let the Management tender its revised proposal in the light of the said queries, within 45 days from today. After the Management tenders its revised proposal, Respondent No. 2 Authority shall deal with the said proposal by following the due procedure laid down in law, Talwalkar 1 ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2025.04.19 15:40:06 +0530 30.WP3344.2025.odt within a period of 45 days thereafter and pass a reasoned order. 3. In the event, an adverse order is passed, the Petitioner would be at liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law. If the approval is granted, further steps for grant of Shalarth I.D. shall be initiated by the respective parties, expeditiously. 4. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Talwalkar 2