Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36416 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. SUNDER LAL BHAMBHU

SAW/941/2024 · 2025-01-03

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, Rekha Borana

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JD:368-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 941/2024 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.), 3. The Commandant 2Nd Battalion Rajasthan, Armed Constabulary (Rac), Headquarter, Kota (Rajasthan). 4. The Director Elementary Education Bikaner, District Bikaner (Rajasthan). 5. The District Education Officer (Headquarter) Elementary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan). ----Appellants Versus Sunder Lal Bhambhu S/o Mula Ram, Aged About 26 Years, Village Sadhuna, Tehsil Nokha, District Bikaner (Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Soni for Mr. B.L. Bhati HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 03/01/2025 1. The appeal is reported to be barred by 177 days. 2. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed to condone the delay. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay caused in filing the present appeal is condoned. 4. Though the case is listed on application for condonation of delay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State would fairly submit that issue raised in this appeal is no longer res [2025:RJ-JD:368-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-941/2024] integra and similar appeal being D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.973/2024 [State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Norti Devi] has been dismissed vide order dated 18.10.2024. 5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to proceed further in the matter. 6. The present appeal stands dismissed accordingly. (REKHA BORANA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 25-KashishS/-