Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36416 (CHH)

Dr. NEELKAMAL GARG (IN PERSON) v. SHAHLA NIGAR

CONT/1384/2025 · 2025-09-08

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45762 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1384 of 2025 1 - Dr. Neelkamal Garg (In Person) S/o Shri R.S.D. Garg Aged About 65 Years Profession Retired Government Employee, Class 3, R/o R.K. Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shahla Nigar Secretary, Agriculture, C.G. Government, Ministry Of Agriculture, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shahla Nigar Agriculture Production Commissioner, Cg Government, Agriculture Forum, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rahul Dev Director Agriculture, Directorate Of Agriculture Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - M.K. Chauhan Joint Director Agriculture, Bilaspur Division, Near Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Satyajit Singh Kanwar Deputy Director Agriculture, Gpm, Opposite Collectorate, Pendra Road, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shersingh Armo Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Pendra Road, Tehsil Parisar, Pendra Road, Gaurela, Distt. Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Dr. Neelkamal Garg (in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional A.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.10 12:42:27 +0530 2 09/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed against non-compliance of the order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure C/1) passed by this Court in WPS No. 1659 of 2025 [Dr. Neelkamal Garg (in person) v. State of Chhattisgarh], by which the respondents were directed to file their reply within a period of four weeks. 2. From perusal of the pleadings made in the contempt petition, as also the order passed by this Court in WPS No. 1659 of 2025, I do not find any good ground to exercise its power of contempt at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge ved