Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36415 (CHH)

SWAPNIL MITTAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1702/2022 · 2025-07-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32881-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1702 of 2022 1 - Swapnil Mittal S/o Suresh Mittal Aged About 36 Years Partner Of M/s S M Shop, R/o D 6, Sector - 2, Agroha Society Behind Rewa Showroom, Raipura, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Garima Sharma W/o Swapnil Mittal Aged About 36 Years Partner Of M/s S M Shop, R/o D 6, Sector - 2, Agroha Society Behind Rewa Showroom, Raipura, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Suresh Mittal S/o Prahalad Mittal Aged About 64 Years Partner Of M/s S M Shop, R/o D 6, Sector - 2, Agroha Society Behind Rewa Showroom, Raipura, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Azad Chowk, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - M/s Chhattisgarh Steel Through Its Partner Mr. Rajesh Agrawal R/o Main Road Jawahar Nagar, Moudhapara, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr.Akhand Pratap, Advocate For Respondent No.1 For Respondent No.2 : : Mr.Sanghrash Pandey, Government Advocate Mr.D.K.Gwalre, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.15 18:34:26 +0530 2 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15.07.2025 1. Heard Mr.Akhand Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr.Sanghrash Pandey, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1/State and Mr.D.K.Gwalre, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayer: “A. Allow the present Petition and quash the impugned FIR No.163/2022 dt. 07.06.2022 [P.S. - Azad Chowk Raipur] registered under Sections 120B & 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 as well as consequential proceedings arising out of or emanating therefrom; and B. Any other order(s) that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case, charge-sheet has been submitted before the concerned Court and the Magistrate has taken cognizance, as such, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the charge- sheet and order taking cognizance. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bablu