APHC010594502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31202/2024 Between: 1. N NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. BAGGIDI GOPAL AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. D.NO. 31-2/1, KOTHAINDIU, RR DEGREE COLLEGE PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR, PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. G SRINIVASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC.- C.L. URBAN PUNGANUR R/AT. PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. REDDEVARI MUNI RAJA, , S/O.LATE CHENNA RAJAPPA, AGED 2 ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSSINESS 8. R KAVITHA, W/O. REDDEVARI MUNI RAJA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSSINESS 9. R SWETHA, , D/O. REDDEVARI MUNI RAJA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE THE RESPONDENTS NO. 7 TO 9 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 24-76/1, MANCHALAVARI STREET, NAGAPALYAM PUNGANUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 10. POLLA THYAGA RAJU, S/O. POOLA MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE. R/O. D.NO. 23-41/3, HIGH SCHOOL STREET, PUNGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No.2 to 5 in registering the crime on the complaint. dated 30-09- 2024 submitted by petitioner against the respondents No.5 to 8 as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on them and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to 5 to register a crime against the respondents No.6 to 10 basing on the complaint, dated 30-09-2024 submitted by petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to 5 to register a crime against the respondents No.6 to 10 basing on the complaint, dated 30-09-2024 submitted by petitioner and take appropriate action against the on the same pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No.2 to 5 in registering the crime on the complaint. dated 30-09-2024 submitted by petitioner against the respondents No.5 to 8 as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on them and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to 5 to register a crime against the respondents No.6 to 10 basing on the complaint, dated 30-09-2024 submitted by petitioner and pass……” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the police received a complaint dated 30.09.2024 through post from the petitioner regarding the interference and creating nuisance by the unofficial respondents. The petitioner did not approach the police personally and on enquiry it is came to know that there is a pending money dispute between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate order giving liberty to the petitioner to appear before the police to pursue his complaint. 4. In the light of the above submission, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue his case by approaching the police station as required. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.07.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 23 WRIT PETITION NO: 31202/2024 Dt.29.07.2025 MH