[2025:RJ-JD:434] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1). S.B. Writ Contempt No. 826/2024 Prasannata Kumari D/o Shri Ram Niwas W/o Shri Sunil Kumar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Neem Ka Thana, Naya Bas, Khidwana, Surajgarh, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With (2). S.B. Writ Contempt No. 834/2024 Dilip Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Near Bsnl Telephone Exchange, Ratan Nagar, Churu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents (3). S.B. Writ Contempt No. 835/2024 Sukha Ram S/o Shri Birbal Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Thalodo Ki Dhani, Aasolai, Vpo Padiyal, Tehsil Phalodi, District Jodhpur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents (4). S.B. Writ Contempt No. 844/2024 Vasudev S/o Shri Prabhu Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o [2025:RJ-JD:434] (2 of 2) [WCP-826/2024] Rajapura, Daboli Methi, Degana, District Nagaur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashish Modi, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jayram Saran For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Ladrecha, AAG assisted by Mr. DS Pidiyar JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 06/01/2025 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that order under consideration has been reversed by the Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Spl. Appeal Writ No.874/2024, decided on 03.12.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to continue with the present contempt proceedings. 4. Notices of contempt are hereby discharged. 5. The contempt petitions stand disposed of for statistical purposes. (DINESH MEHTA),J 218-221-raksha/-