APHC010595952018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28394/2018 Between: M.Bala Tripura Sundari, ...PETITIONER AND The Tirumala Tirupati Devastanams and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 1 and 2 in not regularizing services of Petitioner w.e.f 12.10.2001 as per judgment dt.05.06.2012 in WP No.15773 of 2006 as has been done in respect of similarly situated employee S.Nagarajyalakshmi vide Proceedings Roc.No.Edn 5/865/DEO/02 dt.03.05.2018 issued by 2nd Respondent as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and contrary to law and consequently, direct the Respondents to regularize service of Petitioner as Matron w.e.f. 12.10.2001 and release forthwith Provident Fund sanction Pension Gratuity and all other Retiral benefits to Petitioner reckoning her qualifying service from 12.10.2001 as per the said Judgment dt.05.06.2012 without insisting disposal of WA No.1288/2012 and also set aside letter Roc.No.Edn 5/8651DE0/2002 dt.21.07.2018 of 2nd Respondent and award interest 18 percentage pa w.e.f. 01.07.2012 and with all other consequential benefits monetary or otherwise.” 2 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28394 of 2018 16.04.2025 Mjl /*