2025:HHC:42287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMPMO No. 733 of 2025 Decided on: 8.12.2025 ____________________________________________________ Lehar Singh ……….. petitioner Versus Tilak Raj and others ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Leena Guleria and Mr. Rahul Dhadwal, Advocates. For the respondents : Nemo ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 12.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P., in Civil Suit No. 905 of 2013, titled Tilak Raj vs. Rajesh Kumar and others, whereby an application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the petitioner before the trial Court, stands rejected. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I have perused the impugned order as well as the documents appended with the present petition. 3. While considering an application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, the Court is required to examine the averments in the plaint along with the documents appended thereto. From the impugned order, it is evident that the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 trial Court, after due perusal of the plaint & the documents appended thereto has come to the conclusion that the plaint discloses a cause of action. 4. In view thereof, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial Court. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 8th December, 2025 tarun