Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36398 (RAJ)

MADAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WCP/940/2024 · 2025-07-09

Sandeep Shah, Shree Chandrashekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2024:RJ-JD:40746-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Writ Contempt No. 940/2024 1. Madan Lal S/o Shri Sohan Lal Saini, Aged About 60 Years, Village Sahwa, Ward No.22, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.). 2. Ruparam S/o Syochand, Aged About 61 Years, Village Sahwa, Ward No.07, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.). 3. Balveer @ Brahmananad S/o Sawalaram, Aged About 48 Years, Sahwa, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.). 4. Brijlal S/o Nathu Ram, Aged About 46 Years, Ward No.23, Village Sahwa, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Dinesh Kumar Ias Principal Secretary Revenue Department Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Smt. Pushpa Satyani Ias District Collector, Churu (Raj.). 4. Suryakant Sharma Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.) 5. Imran Khan Tehsildar, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.) 6. Jagtar Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, R/o Village Sahwa, Tehsil Taranagar District Churu (Raj.), Presently R/o Sirsa, Haryana President, Gurudwara Management Committee, Village Sahwa, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu. Presently R/o Sarsa, Haryana 7. Baint Singh S/o Niran Singh, Member, Gurudwara Management Committee, R/o Village Sahwa, Tehsil Taranagar District Churu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : -- [2024:RJ-JD:40746-DB] (2 of 2) [WCP-940/2024] HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS Order 01/10/2024 1. None present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Taking into consideration that although it has been averred in the application that till the date of filing of the petition, order was not complied with, as no one is present in the Court, we are inclined to dispose of this petition at this stage. 3. The authorities are under obligation to decide the matter as per the order dated 20.10.2023. Non-compliance may be brought to the notice of the Court by appropriate authority. 4. The contempt proceeding is closed. (MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ 40-Dinesh/-