Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36395 (CHH)

Dr. NEELKAMAL GARG (IN PERSON) v. SHAHLA NIGAR

CONT/1340/2025 · 2025-09-08

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45763 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1340 of 2025 1 - Dr. Neelkamal Garg (In Person) S/o Shri R.S.D. Garg Aged About 65 Years Profession Retired Govt. Employee, R/o R.K. Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shahla Nigar Secretary Agriculture, C.G. Government, Ministry Of Agriculture, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shahla Nigar Agriculture Production Commissioner, C.G. Government, Agriculture Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rahul Dev Director Agriculture, Directorate Of Agriculture Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - M. K. Chauhan Joint Director Agriculture, Bilaspur Division, Near Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Satyajit Singh Kanwar Deputy Director Agriculture, G.P.M. In Front Of Collectorate, Pendraroad, Distt. Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shresingh Armo Sub Division Officer Agriculture, Pendra Road, Tehsil Parisar Pendra Road, Gaurella, Distt. Gaurella Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 7 - Kamlesh Leena Mandavi Collector, Gpm, Collectrate Near Gurukul, Pendra Road, Distt. Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Dr. Neelkamal Garg (in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional A.G. VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.10 12:43:36 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 09/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed against non-compliance of the order dated 21.02.2025 (Annexure C/1) passed by this Court in WPS No. 1360 of 2025 [Dr. Neelkamal Garg (in person) v. State of Chhattisgarh], by which the State counsel was directed to file their reply within a period of three weeks. 2. From perusal of the pleadings made in the contempt petition, as also the order passed by this Court in WPS No. 1360 of 2025, I do not find any good ground to exercise its power of contempt at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge ved