M/S SRINVIAS ICE FACTORY v. ESTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., & 4 OTHERS
CMA/10/2013 · 2025-07-17
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36391 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010594562013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 10/2013 Between:
1. M/S SRINVIAS ICE FACTORY, W.G.DIST, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI MANTHENA VENKATA NARSIMHA RAJU, S/O.
NARAYANA RAJU, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O. PENNADA, PALAKODERU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM PJCJC.
...APPELLANT AND
1. ESTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEAR GURUDWAR, VISAKHAPATAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. THE CHIEF GNENERAL MANAGER OPERATION TOWN, EASTERN POWR DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, EASTERN POWR DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATION EASTERN, POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PALAKODERU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
IA NO: 1 OF 2012 (CMAMP 2549 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 123 days in re-submitting the Case SR No. 23404 of 2012 in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI
2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.10 of 2013
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no further orders are required and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording, the above submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.07.2025 M K K