Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36390 (CHH)

M/S KAMLA CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3895/2025 · 2025-07-24

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36047-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3895 of 2025 M/s Kamla Construction Partner Rishi Kumar Sharma S/o Pawan Kumar Sharma Aged About 48 Years R/o Nature City, Tahsil -Takhatpur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Mungeli Division District - Mungeli (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department, Mungeli District - Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Bragendra Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr.K.K.Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Prafull Bharat, Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 25.07 .2025 1. Heard Mr. Mr.Bragendra Singh, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr.K.K.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.25 18:42:49 +0530 2 Mr.Prafull Bharat, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief(s): “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to release the remaining payment along with interest at the rate of 18% due to the Petitioner for the work carried out under the aforesaid contract & completion of period of performance guarantee. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu