[2025:RJ-JP:11864] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 723/2025 1. Akram S/o Subedar, Aged About 25 Years, 2. Azad S/o Ibrahim, Aged About 20 Years, both are R/o Jotruhalla, Police Station Gopalgarh, District District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg, Dist. Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khizer Iqbal Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 204/2024 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 111, 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(4), 308(2) and 61(2) of BNS and Section 66-D and 67-a of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by petitioners are triable by Magistrate. The recovery of mobile phones, sim cards, ATM cards etc. have already been effected. The accused petitioners are in custody since 25.12.2024 and trial of the case will take considerable time. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:11864] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-723/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and contended that petitioners alongwith other co- accused involved in cheating the public at large by creating fake mail id’s, whatsapp account. The recovery of mobile phones, sim cards, ATM cards and cheque books etc have been effected from the possession of present accused-petitioners, therefore considering the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioners their bail application deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record, 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that offences alleged to have been committed by petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused petitioners are in custody since 25.12.2025 and the trial of the case will take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Akram S/o Subedar, 2. Azad S/o Ibrahim, in connection with FIR No. 204/2024 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /26