Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36389 (RAJ)

MUKESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10141/2024 · 2025-01-24

Kuldeep Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JD:4718] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14131/2024 Dev Kishan S/o Hanuman Das, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khetasar Basti, Gangashahar, P.s. Gangashahar , Dist Bikaner. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Merta ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10141/2024 Mukesh S/o Shri Bhajan Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Rasisar, P.s. Nokha, Dist. Bikaner,raj. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Nagaur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mangi Lal Vishnoi Mr. Chandrasen Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 24/01/2025 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners do not want to press the instant bail applications. However, they seeks liberty to file the fresh bail applications after the statements of the seizure officer and investigating officer are recorded before the competent Criminal Court. Accordingly, these Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications are dismissed as not pressed with the liberty prayed for. It is expected from the competent criminal court that the statements of the seizure officer and investigating officer will be recorded on priority basis. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 29-mohit/-