Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5088 of 2021 1 - Kalyan Das Mire S/o Late Dukalaha Das Mire Aged About 69 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ram Singh S/o Late Mahettara Sonwani Aged About 55 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Bisauha Jangde S/o Late Manbodhi Jangde Aged About 72 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Prakash Mahilang S/o Late Jogiram Mahilang Aged About 52 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - Vidya Prasad Chaturgosthi S/o Bakhari Lal Chaturgosthi Aged About 60 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Rajendra Kumar Adile S/o Shri Tulsi Prasad Adile Aged About 43 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Karahi, Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahandadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Zanpad Panchayat Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Sarpanch Village Panchayat Karahi, Police Station And Tahsil- Mungeli, Civil And Revenue District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate
2 For Respondent(s) / State : Ms. Neelima Singh Thakur, PL
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board 17/09/2025 1) At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed fresh representation before the respondents/competent authority raising all grounds as raised in this petition along with the copy of petition and in turn, respondents/competent authority may also be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3) On the basis of submission made by both the counsel for the parties, at this stage, without entering into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed fresh representation before the respondents/ competent authority raising all grounds as raised in this petition along with the copy of this petition within ‘30 days’ from today and on submission of such representation the respondents/competent authority is
directed to consider and decide the same within an outer limit of 120 days from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioners.. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE Pawan