Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36387 (AP)

Dr.Janardhan Kalva v. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam

WP/14154/2017 · 2025-06-19

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14154 OF 2017 Between: Dr.Janardhan Kalva, S/o. K. Rama Subbaiah, Aged 33 years, R/o. H.No 1/64 Peddamudiam (Village & Mandal), Kadapa - 516 434, YSR Kadapa District Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Rep. by its Executive Officer Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. S.V.Ayurvedic College, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, rep. by its Principal. 3. The Deputy Executive Officer - Services, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ and declare that the action of respondent in not considering and appointing the petitioner to the post of Senior Lecturer / Assistant Professor in the Department of Kaumarabrithya on par with Dr. S.Asha, who was issued with proceedings Roc.No.C3/407/SVAMI/SVAyC/2013, dated ; 13.04.2017 in pursuance of the notification dated : 22.03.2017 is illegal and arbitrary any consequently direct the respondent to consider and appoint the petitioner to the post of P.G. Senior Lecturer / U.G. Assistant Professor in the Department of Kaumarabrithya. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2Q17(WPMP- NO: 17555 OF 2017) under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Petition stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court direct the respondent to consider and appoint the may be pleased to petitioner to the post Department of Kaumarabrithya in pursuance of Senior Lecturer / Assistant Professor in the of the notification dated ; 22.03.2017. Counsel for the Petitioner :Mrs. K. UDAYA SRI (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI C. SRINIVASA BABA The Court made the following: ORDER 'fv 1 APHC010594422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) im [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14154/2017 Between: ...PETITIONER Dr.janardhan Kalva AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.K UDAYASRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.0 SRINIVASA BABA The Court Made the Following Order:- There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the On last two occasions i.e. on 25.04.2025 and 02.05.2025. 02.05.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption For dismissal”. 2 2. Even today, when the matter is called representation on behalf of the petitioner, petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the there is no It appears that the case. 3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Mrs. K. Udaya Sri, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri C. Srinivasa Baba, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr / Jf' HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.14154of 2017 S' ofAfco» Si (s 1S SEP 2025 ★J DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS