ARPIT AABHAS ISAAC v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
WPC/4210/2022 · 2025-04-21
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36386 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36386 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:17913
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4210 of 2022 1 - Arpit Aabhas Isaac S/o Shri A.V.K. Isaac Aged About 32 Years R/o Dak Bunglow Ward, Civil Line, In Front Of Nehru Garden, Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh (The Name Of The Petitioner No. 1 Is Wrongly Mentioned In The Impugned Award As Arpit, Aabhas) 2 - Eva Samuel Shri A.V.K. Isaac Aged About 41 Years R/o Dak Bunglow Ward, Civil Line, In Front Of Nehru Garden, Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 3 - Apoorva Shiny Isaac D/o Shri A.V.K. Isaac Aged About 36 Years R/o Dak Bunglow Ward, Civil Line, In Front Of Nehru Garden, Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - National Highways Authority Of India Through The Executive Engineer, National Highwarys, Division No. 1, Public Works Departments, Pension Bada, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ Land Acquisition Officer, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Officer Of Inspector General Of Registration And Superintendent Of Stamps Gst Bhawan, Second Floor, Capital Complex, North Block, Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.24 14:09:04 +0530
2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr.Tribid Bhattacharya, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 21/04/2025 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time this petition has rendered infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Permission is granted. 4) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Ravi Mandavi