( 2025:JHHC:33832 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Second Appeal No. 59 of 2014 1.Sachindra Nath Singh (deleted v.o.d. 10.07.2025) Debasish Singh @ Dewashis Singh Roy, S/o late Sachindra Nath Singh 2. Surendra Nath Singh, S/o Late Raghu Nath Singh 3. Krishna Kumar Singh @ Krishna Nath Singh (deleted v.o.d. 10.07.2025) Biswajit Singh, son of late Krishna Kumar Singh @ Krishna Nath Singh 4. Jaideo Singh, S/o Late Manindra Nath Singh 5. Basudeo Singh, S/o Late Manindra Nath Singh 6. Nitai Singh, S/o Late Manindra Nath Singh 7. Bhim Singh (deleted vide order dated 26.09.2025) Suman Singh, the minor son of Late Bhim Singh, represented through his mother and natural guardian, Basanti Singh, W/o Late Bhim Singh, r/o village Bhim Para, Barharwa, P.O. and P.S. Barharwa, Distt. Sahibganj (Jharkhand) 8. Madhu Singh S/o Late Manindra Nath Singh Resident of village- Memari, P.S. Memari, Dist. Burdwan (West Bengal) 9. Sapan Kumar Singh, S/o Jyotindra Nath Singh (deleted vide order dated 10.07.2025) Ranjit Kumar Singh S/o Sapan Kumar Singh 1,3,9 residents of village Bhim Para, Barharwa, P.O. and P.S. Barharwa, Dist. Sahibganj (Jharkhand) … … Appellants/Respondents/Defendants 2nd party Versus 1.Parmeshwar Bhagat, S/o Late Sitaram Bhagat Resident of Thana Road Barharwa, P.S. Barharwa, Subdivision, Rajmahal, P.O. Barharwa, P.S. Barharwa, Dist. Sahibganj … … Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff 1st Party 2. Sobharani Singh, W/o Late Ravindra Nath Singh 3. Somnath Singh, S/o Late Ravindra Nath Singh Both residents of Nuripara Lane Radhanagar, P.O. Bardwan, P.S. Bardwan, Dist. Bardwan (West Bengal) … Respondents/Respondents/Defendants 2nd Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Appellants : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate --- 22/11.11.2025 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants. 2. Learned counsel for all the respondents is present. 3. On 26.09.2025, when the case was taken up, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the parties are likely to enter ( 2025:JHHC:33832 ) 2 into settlement out of court and they prayed for some time to file joint compromise petition. The case is of the year 2014 and no substantial question of law has been framed so far. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents is clueless about the joint compromise. 5. Nobody has appeared when the case is called out and no advance notice seeking adjournment has been circulated. 6. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 7. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Binit Dated: 11/11/2025 Uploaded on 21/11/2025