Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36378 (KAR)

SRI MANJUNATHA REDDY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/99/2025 · 2025-02-05

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5742 CRL.P No. 99 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 99 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MANJUNATHA REDDY S/O GANGA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT 7TH CROSS, MANJUNATHA NAGARA TUMKURU 572 116. 2. SRI NAVEEN Y S/OYATHIRAJU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NEAR KALIDASA JUNIOR COLLEGE SIRA GATE, TUMKUR 572 116. 3. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT C M BADAVANE KYATHASANDRA, TUMKUR – 572 116. 4. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR @ RTI VIJIAYAKUMAR S/O G B SHVIANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT GUBBADAYANNA PALYA HEGGERE POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT – 572 215. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DANADINASHIVARA POLICE TUMKURU DISTRICT REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE 01. Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5742 CRL.P No. 99 of 2025 2. DHANANJAYA A N S/O NAGAAJU A N AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RF/AT ARAKERE VILLAGE DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT – 572 116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THEJESH.P, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR SC.NO.10054/2024 (C.C.NO.979/2024 OF RESPONDENT DANDISHIVARA POLICE STATION, TURRUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 364, 511, 506, 120B R/W 34 IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF VTH ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT TIPTUR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. 2. The said memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl.