Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3636 (BOM)

BABASO SADASHIV EKSHINGE v. SOU. VAISHALI BABSO EKSHINGE

FCA/24/2025 · 2026-08-18

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-FCA-24-2025 (C).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2025 Babaso Sadashiv Ekshinge ] Appellant versus Sou. Vaishali Babso Ekshinge ] Respondent ..... Mr. Kedar Pralhad Lad, Advocate for Appellant. ..... CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 18 AUGUST 2026. P. C. : 1. On 11 August, 2026, following order was passed; “1. The mediation report dated 19 December 2025 has been received, which shows that the mediation is successful. This matter was kept for filing Consent Terms today before this Court. 2. Mr. Kedar Lad, appearing for the appellant – husband submits that his client is not in touch with him and is not responding to his calls. 3. It appears that both the parties are now not interested to prosecute the Family Court Appeal any further. 4. Stand over to 18 August 2026. 5. Matter to come up under caption for “ Dismissal”. 3. Mr. Lad, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant, submits that he has no instructions from his client. Shailaja 1 SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2026.08.18 17:42:18 +0530 3-FCA-24-2025 (C).doc 4. It appears that the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the present Appeal. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.] Shailaja 2