2025:JHHC:38420 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.93 of 2025 1.Gaumi Orav, W/o Subodh Urav 2.Raja Kumar Minj, S/o Subodh Urav Both R/o Village- Dindli Majhi Tola, Adityapur, PO and PS- Adityapur, District- Saraikela Kharsawan (Jharkhand). .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Seraikela Kharsawan. 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Saraikela Kharsawan. 4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Saraikela Kharsawan. 5. The Circle Officer, Gamharia, PO & PS- Adityapur, District- Saraikela Kharsawan. 6. Pradip Kumar Mahto, S/o Late Kashinath Mahto, R/o Dindali Basti, PO and PS- Adityapur, District- Saraikela Kharsawan. .. ... ...Opp. Party(s) ........... CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ......... For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Sunita Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Zaid Imam, AC to SC.VII For the O.P. 6 : M/s Ritu Kumar, Advocate S. B. Deo, Advocate Raj, Advocate …... 07/ 20.12.2025. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 1. The instant Civil Review petition has been filed for reviewing the order dated 09.07.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.3107 of 2025 whereby and whereunder the said Writ Petition was dismissed on the ground that the land belongs to the Housing Board and earlier with regard to it, Eviction Case No.12 of 2013 had attained finality. 2. The instant Civil Review has been filed on the ground that the land, in question does not belong to the Housing Board rather it belongs to the petitioner and the Eviction Case No.12 of 2013 did not arise with respect to the land for which, the said Writ Petition was filed. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that in support of the claim of the title as well as possession over the land, in question, supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner on 17.11.2025 wherein photographs of the house have been fled showing that there was demolition. 4. Learned AC to SC.VII for the State has submitted that although the land belongs to the Housing Board and the Title Suit was filed by the petitioner wherein Housing Board was made as a party. However, purposely, the Housing Board was not made as a party while filing the said Writ Petition. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is raising issue of title in the instant Civil Review Petition. One Original Suit No.17 of 2025 2025:JHHC:38420 2 has already been filed by the Petitioner with respect to the subject matter of the suit and seeks continuation in possession over the land by invoking extra- ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. 6. Petitioner does have efficacious remedy under the Civil Law and needlessly the instant Civil Review Petition has been filed without any merit. 7. The instant Civil Review Petition is dismissed with cost. Cost assessed to be Rs 1000/- to be paid to JHALSA, Ranchi. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/- Uploaded 22.12.2025