Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36359 (CHH)

PURNANAND GAJENDRA v. LEELA RAM VISHWAKARMA

MAC/1705/2019 · 2025-09-02

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1705 of 2019 1 - Purnanand Gajendra S/o Madhav Ram Gajendra Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Daihan, Police Station Gendatola, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. (Owner), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kantilal Sinha S/o Sone Shree Sinha Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Daihan, Police Station Gendatola, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. (Driver), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Leela Ram Vishwakarma S/o Sukhit Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village And Post Godalwahi, Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Subham Vishwakarma S/o Leela Ram Vishwakarma Aged About 5 Years Minor, Through Natural Guardian Father Leela Ram Vishwakarma, S/o Sukhit Ram, R/o Village And Post Godalwahi, Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Kiran Vishwakarma D/o Leela Ram Vishwakarma, Aged About 01 Year, 07 Months, Minor, Through Natural Guardian Father Leela Ram Vishwakarma, S/o Sukhit Ram, R/o Village And Post Godalwahi, Tahsil Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Order on Board 03.09.2025 1) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instructions from his clients. He further submits that appellant have not complied the order dated 20.02.2023. 2) In view of the above, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge H.Ansari HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Digitally signed by HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI Date: 2025.09.08 16:16:22 +0530