Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:39098 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. 67 of 2025 Decided on: 19.11.2025 ____________________________________________________ Sunita Mishra ……….. Petitioner Versus Prem Lata Sharma and others ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rakesh Thakur,
Advocate,
for respondents No. 3 to 6. : None for respondent No. 1. : Respondent No. 2 proceeded against ex parte, vide order dated 07.10.2025, passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial). ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (
oral)
By virtue of the impugned order in the case at hand, an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC has been allowed and the plaint filed by the present petitioner/plaintiff has been rejected. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. In view of the provisions of Section 2(2) of CPC, wherein a ‘decree’ has been defined, the impugned order in the case at hand is a deemed decree and hence appealable.
3. In view thereof, permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to proceed in accordance with law, as prayed, is granted.
4. The present revision is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge November 19th, 2025 Susheel