RAJASTHAN PETROLEUM DEALERS ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9191/2024 · 2025-02-18
Rekha Borana
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36342 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36342 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2024:RJ-JD:30757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9191/2024 Rajasthan Petroleum Dealers Association, Jaipur Through Its State President Dr. Rajendra Singh Bhati S/o Fateh Singh Bhati Aged About 49 Years, R/o Bhawani Niketan, Near Pura Guest House, Sardarshahar, Churu, Rajasthan, 331403 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Petroleum, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Additional Chief Secretary, Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board, New Delhi.
3. Additional Secretary, Department Of Promotion Of Industry And Internal Trade, Central Secretariat, New Delhi.
4. Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Belard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
5. Chairman, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Jamshed Tata Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
6. Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Bhawan, Jaipur.
7. Chief Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Model Town, Jagatpura, Jaipur.
8. Deputy General Manager, State Head, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur.
9. Joint Controller Of Explosives, Faridabad, Haryana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreyash Ramdev HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order 25/07/2024
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-association would be satisfied if the respondent
[2024:RJ-JD:30757] (2 of 2) [CW-9191/2024] authorities are directed to decide the representation dated 30.03.2024 (Annex.3) as preferred on behalf of it.
2.
Learned counsel submits that since last certain years, the De-Duplication and Feasibilty Guidelines as well as guidelines issued in the case of Gulab Kothari vs. State of Rajasthan; 2017(2) RLW 1178 (Raj.) are not being followed by the oil companies and hence, various complaints are being received by the association. The association has hence, moved to the responsible authorities for compliance of the guidelines but the same has been of no avail. He therefore, submits that appropriate directions to decide the representation be passed.
3. In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is
disposed of with the direction to the petitioner-association to move a fresh representation within a period of fifteen days from now. The representation, when moved, be decided by respondent No.2-Additional Chief Secretary, Petroleum And Natural Gas Regulatory Board, New Delhi and respondent No.4-Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Belard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the same.
4. Stay petition and all pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 1-T.Singh/-