APHC010593062008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 551/2008 Between: Marina Sunitha Marina Prabhakara Rao Anr and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N V ANANTHA KRISHNA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 551/2008 ...APPELLANT AND Marina Prabhakara Rao Anr and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent(S): KRISHNA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3509] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 551/2008 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) On 07.01.2025, the following order was passed: “At request made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant to obtain latest instructions, post after Sankranthi Vacation, 2025 in the weekly cause- list.” 2. On 22.01.2025, the following order was passed: “Sri Palanki Karteek, learned counsel representing Sri P.N.Murthy, learned counsel for the appellant seeks time on the ground that learned counsel for the appellant has some personal inconvenience. 2. The matter was listed on 07.01.2025, on which date also learned counsel for the appellant has sought time to secure instructions. 3. Considering the request of learned counsel for the appellant, post in the next weekly cause-list, as last chance.” 3. Sri Palanki Karteek, learned counsel representing Sri P.N.Murthy, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has not been able to obtain instructions. Consequently he has not in a position to argue the matter. 4. The matter pertains to the year 2008. 5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN,J Dated: 28.01.2025 AG 106 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 551/2008 Dated:28.01.2025 AG