IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 RSA-4011-2000 Date of decision : 22.05.2025 Gurinder Pal Singh and another ...... Appellants versus Surinder Kaur and another ....... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Chopra submits that the dispute was with respect to nature of possession over the property, which was owned by Municipal Corporation. Now, Municipal Corporation has demolished the property and thus, the question of nature of possession has been rendered irrelevant. 2. In view thereof, the appeal has been rendered infructuous. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 22.05.2025 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.05.29 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document