IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26054 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- PURUSHOTTAMPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Anarul Miyan S/o Manif Miyan R/o vill - Tilangahi, Bahuarwa, P.s.- Purushottampur, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. X S/o Late Asharfi Yadav R/o vill - Tilangahi, Bahuarwa, P.S.- Purushottampur, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 119 of 2024 dated 25.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 of the BNS and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act and the charge sheet has been submitted u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 of the BNS and section 6 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted and inserted the iron rod into the anus of the informant’s son causing cut injury in intestine. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26054 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no eyewitness to the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific and heinous nature of offence levelled against the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the specific and heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. 7. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T