2025:HHC:37856 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO No. 500 of 2019 Date of decision: 11.11.2025. Reeta Kumar & others …Appellants versus Bhupesh Dhiman & others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellants : Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi & Ms. Niranjna Advocates. Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, vice counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3. For the respondents : Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Learned counsel for the appellants has placed on record a copy of judgment dated 6.1.2025, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in FAO No. 07 of 2025 to urge that in view of the aforesaid judgment, the instant appeal has been rendered infructuous. 2. It is revealed that two separate appeals were filed against the award dated 30.7.2019, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kinnaur at 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- Rampur Bushahr in MACT Case No. 0000019/2016. One of such appeal was registered as FAO No. 07 of 2025 and the other was registered as FAO No. 500 of 2019 i.e. the instant appeal. 3. While deciding FAO No. 07 of 2025, the Coordinate Bench of this Court has set aside the award dated 30.7.2019, passed by the learned Tribunal and has remanded the matter back for decision afresh. 4. Thus, the instant appeal has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 11th November, 2025 Judge (kck)