\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA SECOND APPEAL NO: 660 OF KRISHNA RAO Appeal under Section 100 of C. P.C, against the Judgment and decree 23-07-2019 on the file of 1st Additional and the decree and judgment dt. 18-8-2023 in on the file of the 1st Additional District Court passed in O.S.No.326 of 2017 dated Senior Civil Judge, Guntur A.S.No.180 of 2019 Guntur. Between: 1. Ravinuthala Venkata Srinivasa Rao Rao, Hindu, aged 85 S/o Late Ravinuthala Ramakoteswara years, resident of D.No.50-14-6, Flat No. Sainivasam, Gayatrinagar, Seethampeta 2. Smt. P. Usha, W/o P. 103, Sri Visakhapatnam. Seshukumar, Hindu No.114, Rajendranagar, Behind Khan aged about 56 years, D-1, Market, New Delhi-100 003. -Appellants AND 1. Smt. Ravinuthala Krishna Kumari, Suryanarayana, C/o P. Seshu Kumar, Rajendranagar, Behind Khan Market, 2. Smt. P. Usha, W/o P. Seshukumar, No.114, W/o late Ravinuthala Venkata Hindu, aged 80 years, D-1, No.114 New Delhi-100 003. Hindu, aged about 56 years, D-1 Rajendranagar, Behind Khan Market, 3. Sri P. Narasimha Rao, S/o Late New Delhi-100 003. P. Radhakrishna, Hindu, 2, Sector-12, Dwaraka, New Delhi-100 aged 70 years. D.No.E-6, Vidyut PGHS, Flat No. 078. 4. Sri P. Tapasvi, Son of P. NarasimhaRao, Hindu, aged 46 years, D.No.E-6, Vadyut PGHS, Flat No.2, Sector-12, Dwaraka, New Delhi-100 078. 5. Smt. P. Vaishnavi, W/o M. Naveen Kumar, Hindu, aged 44 years, D.No. E-6, Vadyut PGHS, Flat No.2, Sector-12, Dwaraka, New Delhi-100 078. 6.. Smt. Tanguturi Subbayyamma, W/o late Aswathanarayana, Hindu, aged 75 years, resident of Flat No.406, B Block, Virtex Pleasant, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72. 7. Smt. Turumella Ratna Kumari, W/o Umakantha Rao, Hindu, aged 71 years, resident of D.No.26-30-66, 3rd Line, A.T. Agraharam, Guntur-4. 8. Sri Ravinuthala Prakasha Rao (Died), 9. Smt. Ravinuthala Balaswarna Kumari, W/o Late Mohana Rao, Hindu, aged 67 years, R/o Flat No.202, D.N.R. Shilpa Residency, Road No.22, H.M.T., Swarnapuri Colony, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500049. 10. Smt. M. Rajayalakshmi, W/o M.Subba Rao, Hindu, aged 36 years, C/o Balaswarna Kumari, R/o Flat No.202, D.N.R. Shilpa Residency, Road No.22, H.M.T. Swarnapuri Colony, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500049. 11. Sri Ravinuthala Raghu Vitthal, S/o late Ravinuthala Mohana Rao, Hindu, aged 33 years, R/o Flat No.202, D.N.R. Shilpa Residency, Road No.22, H.M.T. Swarnapuri Colony, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500049. 12. Ravinutala Durga Parameswari, w/o late Prakasarao, aged 68 years. Plot No.5 and 6, Flat No.301, Sriharinagar, Moosapeta, Hyderabad-5000 18. 13. Ravinutala Venkata Siva Rama Pavan Kumar, s/o late Prakasarao, aged 44 years, C/o Durga Parameswari, Plot No. 5 and 6, Sai Amareswari Apartment, Sriharinagar, Moosapeta, Hyderabad-500018. 14. Talluiri Sarada Devi, w/o Gopala Krishsnan, aged 42 years, c/o Durga Parameswari, Sai Amareswari Apartment, Plot No.5 and 6, Flat No.301, Sriharinagar, Moosapeta, Hyderabad-500018. (Relief is claimed only against R-12,13, and 14 being L.Rs of deceased D-8) ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the Respondents No.12 to 14 from alienating property pending disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI R.V.SRINIVASA RAO- PARTY IN PERSON (NO REPRESENTATION) Counsel for the Respondent No.12: SRI SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.660 of 2023 JUDGMENT: When the matter is taken up for hearing on 27.03.2025, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents is present and that the matter was posted to today, under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents is present through virtual hearing. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the second appeal. 3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for prosecution. No costs. non- As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. 2. The Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),Guntur, Guntur District 3. One CC to Sri R.V.Srinivasa Rao, Party in person [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies. stu / HIGH COURT DATED;02/04/2025 JUDGMENT 2 0MPR 2025 ^ ^ . Current section . SA.No.660 of 2023 Pa/j DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION