( 2025:JHHC:34088 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1013 of 2023 ------ The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Dangratoli Chowk, Purulia Road, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.-Lalpur, Dist.-Ranchi, represented through its Dy. Manager and Incharge T.P. Hub, P.S.-Kotwali, Ranchi. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., 3rd Floor, Probodh Tower, S.N. Ganguly Road, Main Road, Ranchi, P.O.-Ranchi, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. Sabina Guria, wife of Late Mansidh Guria 2. Raj Patras Guria, son of Late Mansidh Guria 3. Aksha Saran Sefali Guria, d/o late Mansidh Guria 4. Mariyam Guria, wife of late Prabhu Sahay Guria (Applicant No.2 and 3 are minor represented through their mother, applicant no.1/respondent no.1, guardian and next friend) All are resident of Village-Barda, P.O. & P.S.-Torpa, Dist.- Khunti at present Village-Lowadih, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. Salman Ansari, son of Sajjad Ansari, resident of Millat Colony, Lower Bazar, P.O. & P.S.-Lower Bazar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ganesh C. Jha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : None ------ Order No.08 Dated- 14.11.2025 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of M.A. No. 220 of 2019 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that M.A. No. 220 of 2019 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order. It is next submitted that the counsel for the petitioner could not attend the Court when the case was called out as the counsel were directed to not attend the Court from Bar Council from the 1st week of January, 2023 which continued for two weeks and the same resulted in dismissal of the said M.A. No. 220 of 2019. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in M.A. No. 220 of 2019 and unless M.A. No. 220 of 2019 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the M.A. No. 220 of 2019 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, M.A. No. 220 of 2019 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List M.A. No. 220 of 2019 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14.11.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-